Charlie Kirk’s family blamed Utah officials for failing to prevent the conservative political activist’s fatal shooting at a state university, according to a wrongful death notice announced on Wednesday that presages a possible lawsuit.

Attorneys for the family said Kirk’s death resulted from a string of “reckless decisions” by officials at Utah Valley University (UVU) that left him exposed to a rooftop sniper, who fired a fatal shot from more than 400 feet (122 meters) away on 10 September 2025. UVU has faced harsh criticism for a lack of key safety measures on the day of the shooting.

Kirk, 31, had been debating students in an outdoor courtyard surrounded by tall buildings and with several thousand people in attendance. An Associated Press review following the shooting showed the campus in Orem did not use several public safety practices that have become standard safeguards at events around the country.

Campus police staffing was far below recommended levels for a school of that size. They also did not fly a drone to monitor rooftops or coordinate with local law enforcement to secure the event attended by about 3,000 people. There were no bag checks or metal detectors.

In the notice to state and university officials, Kirk family attorney D Loren Washburn wrote that “the risk of a rooftop shooter should have been especially top-of-mind” given a rooftop shooter’s attempted assassination of Donald Trump in Pennsylvania in July 2024 while he successfully ran for a second presidency.

Washburn called Trump a “close friend and political ally” of Kirk.

The document – dated 9 September, a day before the one-year anniversary of Kirk’s death – is a required step under state law before his family can file a formal claim or lawsuit. It names the university and its then-president, Astrid Tuminez; the campus police department and its chief, Jeffrey Long; and the state of Utah.

A spokesperson for UVU said the university was aware of the notice and would address it “consistent with our established processes.”

“Our focus remains on supporting our campus community,” UVU spokesperson Sharon Turner said in a statement.

The Utah attorney general’s office said it does not comment on potential litigation.

Attorneys for Kirk’s family alleged additional lapses by officials, including not conducting an adequate risk assessment before approving the event, failing to establish a secure perimeter and having no first responders immediately available, resulting in Kirk being taken to a nearby hospital in a private vehicle rather than an ambulance after he was shot.

“Tragically, the UVU parties took none of these safety measures – steps only they had the authority to take – resulting in a situation that rendered Mr Kirk helpless before his assassin,” Washburn wrote.

Long said after the shooting that six of his officers staffed the event and coordinated with Kirk’s eight-person private security team. The school said it was expanding its police force after the shooting.

Utah resident Tyler Robinson turned himself in a day after Kirk’s killing and has been charged with aggravated murder, making him eligible for the death penalty if convicted. Prosecutors say Robinson told his romantic partner that he “had enough of his [Kirk’s] hatred”.

A judge on 1 September ordered the case against Robinson to proceed toward trial. A date had not yet been set as of Wednesday.

Prosecutors during a preliminary hearing in July presented what they characterized as overwhelming evidence against Robinson. That includes surveillance video of Robinson on the campus, DNA tests linking him to a rifle found near the assassination site, and a handwritten note he allegedly left for his romantic partner that read: “I had the opportunity to take out Charlie Kirk, and I took it.”

Kirk’s parents, Robert and Kathryn Kirk, and widow, Erika Kirk, attended the hearings.

State law allows heirs or personal representatives of people who die to file lawsuits seeking damages if the death was caused by a wrongful act or negligence. The notice from Kirk’s family did not specify what damages they may seek.